Workshop contents
Session 1 · Context Engineering
Context Engineering
Giving AI the business rules a manager already knows
Now we move from answering a question to understanding a business. The AI receives the same data, plus the company’s rules, targets, and constraints. When a fact is not in the dataset, it is labeled as a controlled workshop assumption.
Context Map
| Context type | Plain meaning | How it changes the answer |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | What is happening now | The AI knows the starting point instead of guessing. |
| Target | What the company wants to improve | The recommendation has a clear direction. |
| Constraint | What the company cannot break | The AI avoids answers that look smart but cannot be approved. |
| History | What already worked or failed | The AI does not repeat mistakes the business already learned from. |
Add business context
PromptWorkshop ScenarioClick the text, then ⌘C or Ctrl+C
COMPANY CONTEXT: - We are a business-to-business distributor serving corporate and home office customers - Service promise: deliver within the scheduled shipping days - Leadership target: reduce late delivery rate from 54.8% to below 30% in 6 months - How current orders are shipped: Standard Class 59.7%, Second Class 19.5%, First Class 15.4%, Same Day 5.4% - Budget rule: delivery cost cannot increase more than 12% DATASET: [DataCo supply chain data attached] Given this context, analyze our late delivery problem and recommend an action plan in phases that stays within budget. Prioritize by profit impact. Format the plan into three phases: Immediate (0-30 days), Short-Term (30-90 days), and Medium-Term. For each phase, explicitly state the expected budget impact against the 12% ceiling.
The 54.8% starting rate and the shipping mix percentages come from the data Derived Evidence. The service promise, leadership target and budget ceiling are invented for the exercise Workshop Scenario.
Add history, or memory
PromptWorkshop ScenarioClick the text, then ⌘C or Ctrl+C
PREVIOUS ANALYSIS (Q1): - We shifted 15% of Second Class order lines to Standard Class in West of USA - Result: late deliveries dropped 8% in West of USA but increased 3% in US Center - Possible reason: the Standard Class delivery provider has limited US Center capacity Given this history, update your recommendations. Do not repeat strategies that failed. Account for delivery provider capacity differences by region: what each delivery provider can actually handle in each area. Provide a "Revised Action" table contrasting the Q1 approach with the new approach for US Center.
Why This Matters
Key takeawayAnyone can access the same AI model. Your competitive advantage is the context you give it: your rules, your constraints, your history.
How to read the figures on this page
Source Dataread straight from the DataCo dataset
Derived Evidencecalculated from those values
Workshop Scenarioinvented for the exercise; not in the dataset